| Message |
|---|
| yours_truly - Moderator 20:20 - 25 February 2010 1214 posts |
| |
| evenk writes: That's right, inserts replicas of 1935 and 1941 in the case of my Armor not included (hammer hammer did not try), but from the 1937 very well got.
Well what, insert 37th got it and it was clear at once, insert it in principle are the same as that of conventional models. it was a question of whether the insert fits into the housing standard Zippo Replica 35, 41.hotya, apparently, since they insert is not suitable for normal Zippo, then, perhaps, the reverse is hardly possible ... in any case, thanks for the info evenk! |
|
| evenk - Expert Moscow region 21:12 - 25 February 2010 391 posts |
| |
| Please be happy to help, and at the 37th insert standard really. |
|
| Merqury - Member Samara, Russian Federation 9:31 - February 26, 2010 141 posts |
| |
| Thanks for the experiment, a colleague! And insert a replica armor tried to shove? |
|
| yours_truly - Moderator 13:26 - 26 February 2010 1214 posts |
| |
| Merqury writes: And insert a replica armor tried to shove?
I'm counting on it, of course ... but now it seems that he is unlikely to go down! but who knows ... |
|
| evenk - Expert Moscow region 10:55 - 27 February 2010 391 posts |
| |
| Merqury writes: Thanks for the experiment, a colleague! And insert a replica armor tried to shove?
Tried, and that's what poluchilos.V replica 1941 inserts ARMOR (162 and 168) came perfectly, and in 1935 got in okay, but seems to be in the closed position there was a gap between the lid and insert korpusom.Nachal inserts from my other ZIPPO, as if all fit-gap net.Tak that's probably standard inserts are fine, but the gap is a question of manufacturing tolerances. |
|
| Merqury - Member Samara, Russian Federation 12:26 - 27 February 2010 141 posts |
| |
| Thanks again, to enlighten us, curious :-) Overall, as I said, it turns out that the extreme points of hull width is the same, just an ordinary housing side walls are rounded - because of this awkward insert replicas out there and is not included, while the replica, respectively, the side walls are flat, so it Ordinary insert pushes normally, even in the corners of the gap, probably obtained between interstitial and housing. Truncated, satisfy my curiosity, the issue is removed. :-) |
|
| yours_truly - Moderator 13:04 - 27 February 2010 1214 posts |
| |
| evenk Thank you, colleague! Now, like, doubt no more! I, frankly, as expected, that it was you first answer to this question, I remember your collection, namely that it was a replica and conventional models, respectively, so when we were talking about a similar experiment, immediately thought of you! :) |
|
| evenk - Expert Moscow region 20:14 - 27 February 2010 391 posts |
| |
| yours_truly writes: evenk Thank you, colleague! Now, like, doubt no more! I, frankly, as expected, that it was you first answer to this question, I remember your collection, namely that it was a replica and conventional models, respectively, so when we were talking about a similar experiment, immediately thought of you! :)
Thank you, yours_truly! Something you too zahvalili me, but still, very nice. |
|
| yours_truly - Moderator 23:16 - 27 February 2010 1214 posts |
| |
| evenk writes: Thank you, yours_truly! Something you too zahvalili me, but still, very nice.
Well, why not, the main thing that sincerely! :) Sincerely, Yours_Truly |
|
This forum is now closed - read-only 
Input 
