ZippoCollector.ru

Fast scroll mode presmotrel fans 1 and 2, has come to the conclusion that the second interest only first shots with Serebryakov (who skillfully decimated by D.Langrena and the person looks like, hands and feet, waving his skill) and scenes not included in the first part of dug, but more complete nonsense, Fomin and fighting sluggish, and generally all situations Beaten in the kinetic cartoon does not even pull. Sometimes useful to review the movie film in ten or twenty years and come to the conclusion that a complete shit)))

Message edited 23:25 - August 11, 2012 Members Gorynych5

Gee, and I will proceed to viewing Ghoul))) While watching the fans put Equator to download, I think you have to like the movie. ;-)

I looked at the second and the fans ... Listen, it's not even sad shit, it's just utter dross ... Even a pity that at the beginning of the first part of the footage used is nothing in common between them is not at all ... IMHO, of course. The only thing he loved as a black man in the dining room with a compote cheburek selected =)))))))))))))))))

As Ghoul go? ;)))

and online viewing is also allowed as advertising on TV?? ... herasse ...

http://free-torrents.org/forum ..... ndexer.php

What often happens is nowhere to be found.

rights holders put parted

With torrents until uvolokesh already see perehotelos. Of the new films is small, ponra. Only if strongly praising comrades. Then you can splurge on a cinema or at an average piratistosti drive. ))) By the way, "The theory of the binge." Was not looking? Too good, I ponra.

Correspondence. About that guy had a row with his wife and went to experience the drama to a neighbor philosopher alcoholic. A good comedy with good actors.

Happy viewing. In to rehabilitate O.Fomina for the second fan, you can try to look "My name is Harlequin" about Luber. Sam looked really long time, then it was sort of true, but now I will not undertake to judge, can dull ge, have also reviewed))))

Pasch, as well, managed to look Theory binge? Or your dnyuha little different and you saw the film as a documentary chronicling without a smile? )))

Zvonkoff writes:

I looked at him.

DR was good as usual. Some time ago I gave up drinking right now, and I master new horizons of life including sober, I get no pleasure smeared alcohol =))))))))

The film in general is no, there is, of course, very funny moments. But the general outline is good enough for lived in their own skin, so some things really something which reminded that as much zaezhilsya =)))) Funniest there sleepyhead who cling to whatever is handy =))))))

"My name is Harlequin" You are downloaded only as long as do not have time =)))

The taste and color, all the markers are different .. A Harlequin and you can not see, dull, I'll reconsider, in the 1989th it was interesting and informative ... Now tedious and boring. The plot is interesting relationships of different layers of society, but alas, without a spark, too insipid ..

Looked just nakonetsto Avengers. Damn, I love these stories, and so modern special effects =))))))))) Cool, and was glad to put a neighing and =)))))))) On this wave, shake Captain America, and the new, and old =))

Gorin, Harlequin, tried to start to look twice already ... sooo hard that it is progressing in terms of looking - that distract, the crappy mood and I think nothing, just like no luck ... but still try to see out when the thread =))) I found by accident Lawlessness of the Soviet cinema of life behind bars, shake, I want something to look at this topic back of public life.

Well I did not say that it's a fairy tale, just caught my eye, read the annotation, looked at a piece of YouTube, I wanted to see the whole Kaknau. That's all

Yes, Mayhem has done in his time (late 80's) a lot of noise, because was, in fact, the first film about how it is "out there" ... They picked up, so to speak, in the wake of "glasnost" one of the previously taboo topics ... I do it in a movie theater while watching .. Impression on the youth of course he made on me .. But then I got the opportunity to compare it with reality ... Cinema, it is - the movie ..

I'm not going with you, colleagues, argue about it.

Just see this film as some in serious mood and decide for himself - he is bad or good. After all, is not the most important thing sometimes happens in the movies - detailed transfer situation, sometimes much more important than that - the atmosphere, which can or can not create and pass director. When you look and hair stands on end, it is much better than when you look and you see almost documentary footage with calibrated to millimeters arrangement of furniture, soglasovynnye to every breath dialogues and thorough retelling of the existing hierarchy or order. Otherwise it would be, and not a movie at all, and the documentary, which is now too - so full.
That is why it is called - the art, because it is art. We're from the picture in the landscape do not require real immersion in nature, is not it? ...

This is my subjective opinion.

There's something familiar .... Nash is a clean-shaven Marlboro Man? And instead of his yellow Honda coupe?)))